Visit Our Mobile Site

Success Story – Immigrant Child Wins VAWA Case

Salvadoran Immigrant Defeats Deportation Based On Domestic Violence Suffered By Parent

domestic-violence-immigrant-child-victim

Carla was four years old when she and her mother, Veronica, left El Salvador and came to the U.S. They joined her father, Benito, who had entered a few years before. They entered the U.S. illegally, evading inspection.

By the time they arrived, Benito had become a lawful permanent resident under the Special Agricultural Worker program. A few years later, he filed papers to legalize his wife and daughter for benefits through the Family Unity program in effect at that time. The petition was approved. Benito never attempted to sponsor them for permanent resident benefits.

During their 15+ years of marriage, Veronica constantly suffered physical, mental, and psychological abuse at the hands of her husband.

Carla, as well as her younger U.S. born siblings, witnessed many of these incidents – which took place, on the average, two to three times per week. Because of Veronica’s lack of valid immigration status, the family suffered in silence.

If any of the children started to cry, panic, or scream, Benito would take his anger out on them. He was harsher on the boys, and often spared Veronica from his physical wrath.

The family stayed in this abusive relationship until one day when Benito was arrested for alien smuggling. He was convicted in federal court and subsequently deported by the immigration court for life. His lawful permanent resident status was stripped.

How A Denied VAWA Application Became Basis For Carla’s VAWA Defense

Not knowing what to do, Veronica visited a Woman’s Help Center for help. She was told to seek a green card under the Violence Against Women Act. She hired a paralegal to prepare her application.

Upon receiving her paperwork, the government asked for more evidence. When Veronica was unable to provide all the information required, her case was denied. She retreated into hiding from immigration authorities once again.

About five years later, Carla was offered a ride home from high school by one of her friends who had just passed the state driver’s examination. They were pulled over by a police officer. The car matched the description of a vehicle driven by a woman who had stolen some items from a nearby clothes store.

Eventually, no criminal case was filed against them. But since Carla lacked legal immigration papers, she was subsequently served with a notice to appear at immigration court to face deportation charges.

Despite her divorce, Veronica was told by friends that Carla could still proceed under the old petition filed by her father. However, at court, Carla learned since her father had been deported and lost his permanent resident status, filing for a green card under the old petition was not a viable option. The judge suggested that she find a lawyer to assist her.

The pastor at church recommended Carlos because he had helped other congregation members in the past. Carla and Veronica set up a consultation to meet with Carlos at his Riverside immigration office.

As Carlos explored Carla’s family history, he sensed that the domestic violence inflicted on her mother might support a claim for relief from deportation.

Veronica did not agree with Carlos’ view but Carlos was able to convince her to at least give him the chance to explore the possibility in more depth.

To get a clearer picture, Carlos had to obtain all of her mother’s past immigration records, including the denied VAWA petition.

As he had surmised, Veronica’s claim was not rejected on the basis of insubstantial evidence regarding the physical and psychological abuse. She had lost on the basis of other requirements.

Cancellation Of Removal VAWA For Immigrant Children

Although the law had not yet been tested in the manner proposed by Carlos, he firmly believed Carla could present a claim for relief against deportation under Cancellation of Removal as a child victim of domestic violence.

Both Corla and her mother continued to express their doubts, largely due to her mother’s failed VAWA application. In addition, Veronica had been told VAWA claims could not go forward if she had been divorced for more than two years.

Carlos explained the information given to Veronica was only partially true. He stressed the rules for winning a VAWA case at immigration court were different than those governing filings with the USCIS offices.

Carlos pointed out, in court hearings, there were a couple of major distinctions which could potentially benefit Corina.

  • First, he told them, it did not require her father to have current legal status. A child of an abuser who had been a lawful permanent resident – but who lost that status – could still go forward with a VAWA claim.
  • Second, he noted the law protects those who had been the child of a permanent resident or a citizen, even if the parents’ divorce was more than two years ago.
  • Third, Carlos emphasized, not only physical abuse, but also extreme cruelty can support a claim for VAWA Cancellation of Removal – and extreme cruelty in Carla’s case included the psychological anguish of watching the ongoing physical abuse of her mother.

Pain And Victory: VAWA As Defense Against Deportation At Immigration Court

To show the required level of mistreatment, Carlos knew the documents previously filed in her mother’s denied VAWA case would be crucial.

In addition, he decided to interview all of Carla’s U.S. born brothers and sisters – and supplemented the earlier records with their testimony regarding their mother’s relationship with their father.

It was a painful ordeal for the family. However, each child understood that Carla’s odds of winning would increase if they were willing to share recollections of their father’s violent past.

Carlos also learned about – and obtained documents regarding – how Carla’s school performance had been negatively affected by her mother’s dysfunctional marriage to Benito.

Armed with this evidence, Carlos presented Carla’s claim for VAWA relief for abused children under Cancellation of Removal at Carla’s immigration trial.

The government tried to derail Carla’s case on technical grounds. The judge dismissed their arguments. He agreed with Carlos’ interpretation of the untested law – that Carla’s matter fit within the parameters outlined by Congress, even though he had not overseen a case with such issues beforehand.

The judge cancelled Carla’s deportation proceedings and granted an adjustment of her immigration status to legal permanent resident.

Carla, Veronica, and her family were elated. They understood that without their ability to stick together as a family, Carla would have been separated from them, perhaps for their entire lives.

Today, Carla is a U.S. citizen. She is the happily married mother of a professional bookkeeper with two young children.

stroke

 

This article, centered on deportation defense issues and the Violence Against Women Act, is part 11 of a series on the successes of immigration lawyer in different types of cases. Follow the link below to read more:

Abused Immigrant Earns “U” Visa And Legal Residency

 

stroke

 

immigration-lawyer-carlos-batara-telephone-numbers

 

Get the Flash Player to see the slideshow.